As cryptocurrency adoption grows, so does the demand for sophisticated trading infrastructure, such as market-making services that ensure liquidity and price stability for digital assets. However, the highly regulated nature of financial markets means that firms offering cryptocurrency market-making must navigate a complex legal environment. Understanding regulatory considerations is critical for service providers, exchanges, and token issuers alike to ensure compliance and mitigate risks.
The Evolving Regulatory Landscape
Regulations governing cryptocurrency market-making vary significantly across jurisdictions. Some countries have established comprehensive frameworks, while others are still developing their approach. For example, the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation provides clarity on requirements for market participants, including market-makers. In contrast, the United States applies a patchwork of federal and state-level laws, with the SEC and CFTC overseeing different aspects of crypto trading. Asia presents a mixed landscape, with Singapore’s Payment Services Act and Hong Kong’s Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) regime providing clearer guidelines, whereas other markets like China maintain strict prohibitions on crypto activities. Firms operating cryptocurrency market-making services must ensure they are familiar with the legal requirements specific to their operational jurisdictions, including licensing, reporting obligations, and anti-money laundering (AML) compliance.
Licensing and Authorisation Requirements
Many regulators classify cryptocurrency market-making as a regulated financial activity, subjecting it to licensing or registration requirements. Market-makers providing liquidity on behalf of exchanges or token projects may need to obtain specific authorisations, such as a Capital Markets Services (CMS) licence in Singapore or a broker-dealer licence in the United States. Failure to comply can result in enforcement actions, fines, or even criminal liability. Market-makers may fall under broader securities or commodities laws even in jurisdictions without explicit crypto market-making rules. As a result, service providers must carefully assess whether their activities qualify as financial services under existing legal definitions and take appropriate steps to secure the necessary permissions.
Compliance with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know-Your-Customer (KYC) Standards
Crypto market-making services often face scrutiny over AML and KYC obligations. Regulators expect market-makers to implement robust compliance frameworks that prevent illicit activities such as money laundering and terrorist financing. It includes customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, and reporting of suspicious activities. Even if a market-maker does not directly onboard retail customers, they must assess the risks associated with their trading counterparties and exchanges. Non-compliance can result in significant penalties and reputational damage, as demonstrated by high-profile cases involving crypto firms facing regulatory sanctions for lax AML controls.
ALSO READ: Fundamentals of Market-Making Part I: Marketplace Design
Transparency, Reporting, and Market Integrity
Transparency is a core regulatory expectation for cryptocurrency market-making. Regulators increasingly demand that market-makers disclose their trading activities, provide clear audit trails, and ensure fair market practices. This approach is especially relevant in jurisdictions where regulators monitor for potential market manipulation, wash trading, or front-running. Market-makers must implement internal controls to avoid conflicts of interest, ensure that liquidity provision is fair and non-discriminatory, and avoid creating artificial price movements. They must also keep accurate records of trading data for regulatory audits and reviews.
The Need for Proactive Engagement
Given the evolving nature of crypto regulation, market-makers must stay informed about legislative changes and regulatory updates. Engaging proactively with regulators, participating in public consultations, and maintaining open lines of communication can help market-makers shape policies and ensure compliance. Many jurisdictions encourage dialogue with crypto businesses to develop practical and effective regulations that balance innovation with risk management.
In summary, regulatory compliance is not optional for firms offering crypto market-making services. They must follow licensing regimes, fulfil AML/KYC duties, maintain transparency, and communicate with authorities. Failure to meet these criteria can result in legal liability and reputational harm, undermining both the firm’s operations and the broader trust in the cryptocurrency ecosystem.
Visit Caladan and let us help you navigate the evolving world of cryptocurrency with confidence.
